BIX/CPR100B Guide: Half Body CPR Training Manikin — Reliable Mechanical Feedback, No Electronics
Product Description
|
|
|
|
Model |
BIX/CPR100B — Half Body CPR Training Manikin |
|
Summary |
Half body CPR training manikin, pure mechanical: no batteries or electronics, airway opening, mouth-to-mouth breathing, compressions and 30:2 cycles. |
|
Airway & Breathing |
Simulate airway opening; artificial mouth-to-mouth breathing (blowing) |
|
Compressions |
Manual chest compressions; page describes mechanical click feedback for correct compression depth |
|
Ratio & Cycle |
30 compressions then two blows; five cycles of 30:2 |
|
Frequency / Mode |
At least 100 beats/min; training mode |
|
Components |
Head, torso, lung bags, mask |
|
Design |
Pure mechanical — no batteries, no electronics, zero maintenance |
|
Certification / Price |
ISO 13485 & CE (page-stated); USD 117.84 per unit |
|
Audience |
Schools and entry-level training, community first aid, high-volume basic courses |
Educational-use note: educational equipment, not a medical device for patient use. Request the spec sheet for lung bags and spare parts.
1. Why a Mechanical Manikin Carries the Entry Level
Every CPR programme has two problems: too few manikins, and too little budget. Both are solved the same way — with equipment that costs less, needs no charging and can be handed to a beginner without an electronics briefing.
The case for low-cost models is stated plainly in the literature: a randomized crossover study of 42 laypersons was built on the premise that mass CPR training using less expensive and easily portable manikins is one way to increase the number of trained laypeople in a short time. It compared a low-cost model with a conventional manikin, measuring compressions with blinded accelerometer devices and without any feedback during measurement (Tanaka et al., 2017).
The finding matters for how you buy. Both models achieved satisfactory compression rates — 84% of compressions on the low-cost model fell within the adequate 100–120/min band versus 79.5% on the conventional manikin (p = 0.457). Depth was the weak point for both: only 1.5% and 5.5% respectively reached adequate depth, and the majority of participants, especially older learners, struggled with depth; only the under-20 group reached an adequate median depth on the conventional manikin (p = 0.0024) (Tanaka et al., 2017).
That explains the CPR100B's place in a curriculum: a mechanical manikin with click feedback for correct compression depth gives beginners repetition and a physical cue at a price that lets a school own a class set. Where depth precision must be proved, the electronic models take over (section 4).
2. Evidence
|
Evidence |
Finding |
Relevance |
|
Tanaka et al., 2017 |
Crossover, 42 laypersons, no feedback during measurement: rates satisfactory on both (84% vs 79.5%); adequate depth only 1.5% vs 5.5% |
Low-cost models suit mass training; depth needs a cue |
|
Aloush et al., 2019 |
110 middle school children: weakness before, significant improvement after; BLS should be compulsory in schools |
School programmes work |
|
Işık et al., 2026 |
170 fifth/sixth graders, 2-hour programme: improvement immediately (p < 0.05), scores fell significantly at 2 weeks |
Repetition, not one-off courses |
|
Pedrazas-López et al., 2023 |
Cluster RCT, 1327 schoolchildren: theory + practical beat theory-only at 3–12 months (P < .001) |
Practical training retains better |
|
Navarro-Patón et al., 2018 |
124 teacher students, 3 programmes: feedback devices led on depth, rate, recoil, correct compressions (p < 0.001), then the traditional course, then audio-visual |
Hands-on beats video-only |
|
Baldi et al., 2017 |
RCT, 450 laypersons: feedback improved depth (p = 0.005), recoil (71.7% → 86.6% → 88.8%) and Total CPR Score (p < 0.001) |
Short feedback exposure suffices |
3. What the CPR100B Lets You Teach
A. Basic sequence and rate
Airway opening, mouth-to-mouth breathing and manual compressions are practised on one unit, with the 30:2 ratio and five-cycle structure built into the drill: 30 compressions, two breaths, five times. The model is specified for at least 100 beats/min — the lower bound of the range used in current guidance — and tempo can be rehearsed against a metronome, the check being five cycles in roughly two minutes.
C. A physical cue for depth
The page describes mechanical click feedback for correct compression depth — the difference between pressing and pressing correctly, signalled without electronics.
D. Lung inflation, airway opening and class volume
The manikin includes lung bags and a mask, so students see inflation with a correct breath and practise head-tilt/chin-lift airway opening — the skills that failed most often before training (Aloush et al., 2019). Nothing is battery-dependent, so one instructor can run several stations and keep a whole class compressing, in rooms with no power.
4. Where the CPR100B Sits in the CPR Line
|
Model |
Format |
Feedback |
Best for |
|
CPR100B |
Half body, mechanical |
Click feedback for depth; no electronics |
Schools, entry-level, high-volume courses |
|
CPR100A |
Half body |
Mechanical, AHA 2020 compliant |
Courses needing AHA compliance |
|
CPR230 |
Half body, computer |
Depth lights, voice prompt, counters, exam mode |
Technique correction with scoring |
|
CPR260 |
Half body + printer |
Digital, printed record |
Printed evidence requirements |
|
CPR280 |
Full body, computer |
Pulse simulation, LCD feedback |
Scenario-based team training |
|
CPR490 |
Full body simulator |
Vital signs, barcode, printed reports |
Assessment centres |
Buying logic: buy the CPR100B in class sets for the beginner tier — no charging, minimal maintenance. Move learners to CPR230 when depth and rate must be measured, and to CPR260/CPR490 for printed evidence. If a tender names AHA compliance, use the CPR100A.
5. Teaching Protocol
|
Station |
Time |
Activity |
|
A. Airway |
10 min |
Head-tilt/chin-lift; confirm airway opening |
|
B. Compressions |
20 min |
Compression-only; find the click, keep tempo at 100+/min |
|
C. Ventilation |
15 min |
Mouth-to-mouth via mask; watch the lung bags |
|
D. Ratio drill |
20 min |
30:2 for five cycles; count aloud |
|
E. Assessed round |
15 min |
Uncoached five-cycle run |
Assessment checklist
- Airway opened before ventilation attempted
- Hand position established before the first compression
- Compressions at 100+/min with the click reached
- Ventilation producing visible lung inflation
- 30:2 ratio maintained for five complete cycles
- No prolonged interruption between cycles
6. Maintenance
|
Item |
Frequency |
Notes |
|
Face, chest skin and torso |
Each session |
Mild disinfectant; mask or face shield |
|
Lung bags |
Each session |
Check leaks and seating |
|
Mask and storage |
Per class |
Clean or replace; store dry, out of sun |
7. FAQ
Q1: What is the BIX/CPR100B? A: A half body CPR training manikin, pure mechanical — no batteries, no electronics. Components: head, torso, lung bags, mask.
Q2: What can students practise on it? A: Airway opening, mouth-to-mouth breathing, manual compressions and the 30:2 ratio over five cycles, with click feedback for compression depth.
Q3: Does it need batteries or charging? A: No — the mechanical design suits high-volume courses and venues without power.
Q4: Is a mechanical manikin accurate enough for beginners? A: For rate yes: in a crossover study of 42 laypersons, 84% of compressions on a low-cost model fell within the adequate 100–120/min band. Depth was harder for participants, which the click cue addresses; where precision must be measured, use an electronic model.
Q5: What is the price and MOQ? A: Listed at USD 117.84 per unit; MOQ 1 unit. Pricing depends on configuration — email adateaching@adaanatomy.com for a quotation.
Q6: What certifications and shipping terms apply? A: ISO 13485 & CE as stated on the product page; air freight 7–10 days, sea freight 30–45 days. Details: adateaching@adaanatomy.com
References
Low-Cost vs Conventional Training Manikins (Tanaka et al., 2017)
BLS Training for Middle School Students (Aloush et al., 2019)
Brief CPR Training and Retention (Işık et al., 2026)
Practical Training in Schools: Cluster RCT (Pedrazas-López et al., 2023)
Three BLS Teaching Programmes Compared (Navarro-Patón et al., 2018)
Real-Time Visual Feedback for Laypersons (Baldi et al., 2017)