BIX/CPR100B Guide: Half Body CPR Training Manikin — Reliable Mechanical Feedback, No Electronics

Product Description

 

 

Model

BIX/CPR100B — Half Body CPR Training Manikin

Summary

Half body CPR training manikin, pure mechanical: no batteries or electronics, airway opening, mouth-to-mouth breathing, compressions and 30:2 cycles.

Airway & Breathing

Simulate airway opening; artificial mouth-to-mouth breathing (blowing)

Compressions

Manual chest compressions; page describes mechanical click feedback for correct compression depth

Ratio & Cycle

30 compressions then two blows; five cycles of 30:2

Frequency / Mode

At least 100 beats/min; training mode

Components

Head, torso, lung bags, mask

Design

Pure mechanical — no batteries, no electronics, zero maintenance

Certification / Price

ISO 13485 & CE (page-stated); USD 117.84 per unit

Audience

Schools and entry-level training, community first aid, high-volume basic courses

Educational-use note: educational equipment, not a medical device for patient use. Request the spec sheet for lung bags and spare parts.

 

1. Why a Mechanical Manikin Carries the Entry Level

Every CPR programme has two problems: too few manikins, and too little budget. Both are solved the same way — with equipment that costs less, needs no charging and can be handed to a beginner without an electronics briefing.

The case for low-cost models is stated plainly in the literature: a randomized crossover study of 42 laypersons was built on the premise that mass CPR training using less expensive and easily portable manikins is one way to increase the number of trained laypeople in a short time. It compared a low-cost model with a conventional manikin, measuring compressions with blinded accelerometer devices and without any feedback during measurement (Tanaka et al., 2017).

The finding matters for how you buy. Both models achieved satisfactory compression rates — 84% of compressions on the low-cost model fell within the adequate 100–120/min band versus 79.5% on the conventional manikin (p = 0.457). Depth was the weak point for both: only 1.5% and 5.5% respectively reached adequate depth, and the majority of participants, especially older learners, struggled with depth; only the under-20 group reached an adequate median depth on the conventional manikin (p = 0.0024) (Tanaka et al., 2017).

That explains the CPR100B's place in a curriculum: a mechanical manikin with click feedback for correct compression depth gives beginners repetition and a physical cue at a price that lets a school own a class set. Where depth precision must be proved, the electronic models take over (section 4).

 

2. Evidence

Evidence

Finding

Relevance

Tanaka et al., 2017

Crossover, 42 laypersons, no feedback during measurement: rates satisfactory on both (84% vs 79.5%); adequate depth only 1.5% vs 5.5%

Low-cost models suit mass training; depth needs a cue

Aloush et al., 2019

110 middle school children: weakness before, significant improvement after; BLS should be compulsory in schools

School programmes work

Işık et al., 2026

170 fifth/sixth graders, 2-hour programme: improvement immediately (p < 0.05), scores fell significantly at 2 weeks

Repetition, not one-off courses

Pedrazas-López et al., 2023

Cluster RCT, 1327 schoolchildren: theory + practical beat theory-only at 3–12 months (P < .001)

Practical training retains better

Navarro-Patón et al., 2018

124 teacher students, 3 programmes: feedback devices led on depth, rate, recoil, correct compressions (p < 0.001), then the traditional course, then audio-visual

Hands-on beats video-only

Baldi et al., 2017

RCT, 450 laypersons: feedback improved depth (p = 0.005), recoil (71.7% → 86.6% → 88.8%) and Total CPR Score (p < 0.001)

Short feedback exposure suffices

 

3. What the CPR100B Lets You Teach

A. Basic sequence and rate

Airway opening, mouth-to-mouth breathing and manual compressions are practised on one unit, with the 30:2 ratio and five-cycle structure built into the drill: 30 compressions, two breaths, five times. The model is specified for at least 100 beats/min — the lower bound of the range used in current guidance — and tempo can be rehearsed against a metronome, the check being five cycles in roughly two minutes.

C. A physical cue for depth

The page describes mechanical click feedback for correct compression depth — the difference between pressing and pressing correctly, signalled without electronics.

D. Lung inflation, airway opening and class volume

The manikin includes lung bags and a mask, so students see inflation with a correct breath and practise head-tilt/chin-lift airway opening — the skills that failed most often before training (Aloush et al., 2019). Nothing is battery-dependent, so one instructor can run several stations and keep a whole class compressing, in rooms with no power.

 

4. Where the CPR100B Sits in the CPR Line

Model

Format

Feedback

Best for

CPR100B

Half body, mechanical

Click feedback for depth; no electronics

Schools, entry-level, high-volume courses

CPR100A

Half body

Mechanical, AHA 2020 compliant

Courses needing AHA compliance

CPR230

Half body, computer

Depth lights, voice prompt, counters, exam mode

Technique correction with scoring

CPR260

Half body + printer

Digital, printed record

Printed evidence requirements

CPR280

Full body, computer

Pulse simulation, LCD feedback

Scenario-based team training

CPR490

Full body simulator

Vital signs, barcode, printed reports

Assessment centres

Buying logic: buy the CPR100B in class sets for the beginner tier — no charging, minimal maintenance. Move learners to CPR230 when depth and rate must be measured, and to CPR260/CPR490 for printed evidence. If a tender names AHA compliance, use the CPR100A.

 

5. Teaching Protocol

Station

Time

Activity

A. Airway

10 min

Head-tilt/chin-lift; confirm airway opening

B. Compressions

20 min

Compression-only; find the click, keep tempo at 100+/min

C. Ventilation

15 min

Mouth-to-mouth via mask; watch the lung bags

D. Ratio drill

20 min

30:2 for five cycles; count aloud

E. Assessed round

15 min

Uncoached five-cycle run

Assessment checklist

  • Airway opened before ventilation attempted
  • Hand position established before the first compression
  • Compressions at 100+/min with the click reached
  • Ventilation producing visible lung inflation
  • 30:2 ratio maintained for five complete cycles
  • No prolonged interruption between cycles

 

6. Maintenance

Item

Frequency

Notes

Face, chest skin and torso

Each session

Mild disinfectant; mask or face shield

Lung bags

Each session

Check leaks and seating

Mask and storage

Per class

Clean or replace; store dry, out of sun

 

7. FAQ

Q1: What is the BIX/CPR100B? A: A half body CPR training manikin, pure mechanical — no batteries, no electronics. Components: head, torso, lung bags, mask.

Q2: What can students practise on it? A: Airway opening, mouth-to-mouth breathing, manual compressions and the 30:2 ratio over five cycles, with click feedback for compression depth.

Q3: Does it need batteries or charging? A: No — the mechanical design suits high-volume courses and venues without power.

Q4: Is a mechanical manikin accurate enough for beginners? A: For rate yes: in a crossover study of 42 laypersons, 84% of compressions on a low-cost model fell within the adequate 100–120/min band. Depth was harder for participants, which the click cue addresses; where precision must be measured, use an electronic model.

Q5: What is the price and MOQ? A: Listed at USD 117.84 per unit; MOQ 1 unit. Pricing depends on configuration — email adateaching@adaanatomy.com for a quotation.

Q6: What certifications and shipping terms apply? A: ISO 13485 & CE as stated on the product page; air freight 7–10 days, sea freight 30–45 days. Details: adateaching@adaanatomy.com

 

References

Low-Cost vs Conventional Training Manikins (Tanaka et al., 2017)

BLS Training for Middle School Students (Aloush et al., 2019)

Brief CPR Training and Retention (Işık et al., 2026)

Practical Training in Schools: Cluster RCT (Pedrazas-López et al., 2023)

Three BLS Teaching Programmes Compared (Navarro-Patón et al., 2018)

Real-Time Visual Feedback for Laypersons (Baldi et al., 2017)

Created on:2026-09-15